eDiscovery, legal research and legal memo creation - ready to be sent to your counterparty? Get it done in a heartbeat with AI. (Get started for free)
What legal implications does the Knox County v.
Ninth National Bank of City of New York court case have on modern banking regulations and financial institutions?
The Knox County v.
Ninth National Bank of City of New York case was a landmark Supreme Court decision that established the principle of "holder in due course," which protects innocent third-party holders of negotiable instruments from fraud and other defenses.
The case set a precedent for the modern concept of negotiability, allowing financial instruments to be freely transferable and facilitating commerce.
The Supreme Court's decision in Knox County v.
Ninth National Bank of City of New York has been cited over 1,600 times, making it one of the most influential cases in American legal history.
The Supreme Court's decision was written by Justice John Marshall Harlan, a prominent jurist who served on the Court from 1877 to 1911.
The Knox County v.
Ninth National Bank of City of New York case was argued before the Court on December 2, 1892, and the decision was handed down on January 3, 1893.
The case has been cited in numerous subsequent Supreme Court decisions, including the landmark case of Birkbeck v.
State, which established the principle of "implied warranty of authority."
The Knox County v.
Ninth National Bank of City of New York decision has been influential in shaping the development of modern banking law, with implications for the negotiability of financial instruments and the rights of holders in due course.
The case has been the subject of extensive academic and scholarly analysis, with many legal scholars regarding it as a foundational case in the development of American commercial law.
The Knox County v.
Ninth National Bank of City of New York decision has been cited in numerous federal appellate and district court decisions, demonstrating its ongoing relevance and influence in the American legal system.
The case has implications for modern financial institutions, as it helps to facilitate the transfer of financial instruments and provides protections for innocent third-party holders.
The Knox County v.
Ninth National Bank of City of New York decision has been cited in cases involving a wide range of financial instruments, including bonds, notes, and certificates of deposit.
The case has been influential in shaping the development of Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which governs negotiable instruments and the rights of holders in due course.
The Knox County v.
Ninth National Bank of City of New York decision has been cited in cases involving complex financial transactions, including those involving derivatives and other exotic financial instruments.
The case remains an important part of the American legal canon, with ongoing implications for modern banking regulations and financial institutions.
eDiscovery, legal research and legal memo creation - ready to be sent to your counterparty? Get it done in a heartbeat with AI. (Get started for free)