eDiscovery, legal research and legal memo creation - ready to be sent to your counterparty? Get it done in a heartbeat with AI.

Save hours with just one case. Have AI do all the hard work of discovery and research and coming up with a consistent line of argumentation - you can just review the results!

Please note we never provide legal advice - none of our documents are created or reviewed by an attorney at law.

We use high-end AI models trained on billions of legal documents and impressive reasoning scores such as Claude Opus. Get started for free.

How Does it Work?


Upload your files for eDiscovery

Provide us with your source files (i.e. court filings, case files, evidence files and prior written exchanges). Then provide us with the task (i.e. provide a letter to the opposing party that summarizes my main arguments). Our AI will run a complete ediscovery on your documents, research all applicable codes and legal precedent and provide you with a complete argumentation for your side of the case. All you have to do is review the pdf we will send you and send it out!

Keep in mind we only provide documents - we do not provide any legal advice. This website is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The content on this site is provided as general information and should not be interpreted as legal guidance. You should consult with a qualified legal professional for advice regarding your individual situation. Viewing or using this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship.


Most orders take 1-2 hours while some may take up to 24 hours.

Say goodbye to hours of discovery and reading legal documents and writing drafts. Instead have our our AI do all the hard work and you can simply say yes/no at the end just like you would task a Junior Lawyer.


    Download and use your documents & Privacy expectations

    After your legal files are created, you can easily download and use them in whatever way you need. Please see our FAQ for more information on data privacy.

    See for yourself

    Supreme Court decision - KELO et al. v. CITY OF NEW LONDON et al.

    Argued February 22, 2005—Decided June 23, 2005

    Read how legalpdf.io would have prepared the lawyers for Susan Kelo to argue their case

    What the critics say:

    This document thoroughly researches and cites the original meaning of 'public use from sources like Blackstone, state constitutions, early Supreme Court cases. This provides a strong basis to argue for a narrow interpretation. Contrasts the original meaning with the flawed precedents of Berman and Midkiff. It raises important criticisms like lack of principle/logic, risk to property rights, vulnerability of the poor, incentives for corruption and appeals to basic principles like natural rights and limited government. Overall it is a forcefully argued position from an originalist standpoint, but may need to anticipate counterarguments and pragmatic concerns to persuade skeptical judges.

    Download Full (AI Generated) Argumentation on behalf of Susan Kelo.


    Read how legalpdf.io would have prepared the lawyers for GETTYSBURG ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY to argue their case

    What the critics say:

    The letter builds a strong legal argument against the condemnation by structuring it around the main issues like lack of public use, inadequate appropriation, and improper taking of railway property. Each issue is broken down into sub-points that methodically explain the reasoning with citations to case law precedents. The letter maintains an authoritative yet respectful tone appropriate for a court filing. It makes effective use of rhetorical techniques like reasoning from precedent, questioning vague legislative intent, and appealing to constitutional rights and protections. The concerns over disrupted railway service and lack of due process are persuasive moral arguments. Overall, the letter presents a cohesive, supported case that the condemnation overreaches federal power and violates property rights.

    Download Full (AI Generated) Argumentation on behalf of GETTYSBURG ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY.


    Read how legalpdf.io would have prepared the lawyers for ANDY WARHOL FOUNDATION to argue their case

    What the critics say:

    The letter builds a strong legal argument for fair use by methodically explaining how Warhol's works were transformative. It cites artistic details like the changes in color, contrast, cropping, and background to show Warhol altered the original aesthetics. It analyzes how Warhol's works conveyed a different message about celebrity and culture. The letter anchors its analysis in past court decisions recognizing Warhol's works as transformative. It connects transformative uses to copyright's goal of promoting creativity. The tone is authoritative yet reasonable. Overall, the letter cohesively argues Warhol's works were highly transformative and deserve fair use protection based on legal principles and public policy.

    Download Full (AI Generated) Argumentation on behalf of ANDY WARHOL FOUNDATION FOR THE VISUAL ARTS

    legalpdf.io is a true asset in the legal field. As a litigation attorney, I'm constantly juggling numerous cases and their associated paperwork. Having an AI do discovery, legal research and draft letters to the opposing party is simply unbelievable!
    As a practicing lawyer, time is of the essence when it comes to preparing legal documents. legalpdf.io has been a game-changer for me. This tool is a must-have for any legal professional in 2023 and beyond.