eDiscovery, legal research and legal memo creation - ready to be sent to your counterparty? Get it done in a heartbeat with AI. (Get started for free)

What is MATAL v. TAM and how does it affect intellectual property rights

MATAL v. TAM is a landmark Supreme Court case that affirmed the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's ruling that the Lanham Act's provision prohibiting the registration of trademarks that may disparage persons, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols violates the First Amendment's free speech clause.

The case involved a band called The Slants, whose founder Simon Tam sought to register the band's name with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The Office denied the application, finding that the term slants was disparaging to persons of Asian descent. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the Lanham Act's disparagement clause was unconstitutional, as it engaged in viewpoint discrimination, which is impermissible under the First Amendment. The Court rejected the government's argument that registered trademarks constitute government speech, and that the disparagement clause was a valid condition of a government subsidy. The decision affirmed the importance of free speech, even for potentially controversial or offensive trademarks, and set a precedent that the government cannot deny trademark registration based on the viewpoint expressed.

eDiscovery, legal research and legal memo creation - ready to be sent to your counterparty? Get it done in a heartbeat with AI. (Get started for free)

Related

Sources

×

Request a Callback

We will call you within 10 minutes.
Please note we can only call valid US phone numbers.