In the case of Terry v. Sharon, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether an order reviving a suit in equity could be appealed. The court found that such an order was not a final judgment and therefore could not be appealed.
The case originated in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. After the initial plaintiff died, their executor sought to revive the suit in the name of the executor. The defendants appealed the order reviving the suit, arguing that the trial court never had proper jurisdiction over the case. However, the Supreme Court ultimately dismissed the appeal, holding that the order reviving the suit was not a final judgment and thus not appealable. The Court reasoned that the order was more akin to post-judgment proceedings, such as enforcement by execution, which are generally not immediately appealable.
Also worth reading: What happened during Jared Leisek's preliminary hearing and what are the legal implications? · What should law firms include in an AI eDiscovery evaluation checklist in 2026? · What are the best legal tech model evaluation frameworks for AI eDiscovery and legal document drafting in 2026?