Automate legal research, eDiscovery, and precedent analysis - Let our AI Legal Assistant handle the complexity. (Get started for free)

What are the key legal principles and precedents established by the case of ZADIG et al. v. BALDWIN, and how did this landmark case shape the landscape of digital privacy law?

The case of ZADIG et al.

v.

BALDWIN was decided by the U.S.

Supreme Court on April 19, 1897, in a 9-0 ruling, demonstrating the importance of constitutional interpretation in U.S.

law.

The case involved the interpretation of section 26 of article 4 of the constitution of the state of California, which states that contracts for the sale of shares of a corporation's stock on margin or to be delivered at a future day are void.

The plaintiff based her right to recover on this section, which states that contracts for the sale of shares of a corporation's stock on margin or to be delivered at a future day are void.

Automate legal research, eDiscovery, and precedent analysis - Let our AI Legal Assistant handle the complexity. (Get started for free)