eDiscovery, legal research and legal memo creation - ready to be sent to your counterparty? Get it done in a heartbeat with AI. (Get started for free)
What are the key differences and similarities between SUMI and YOUNG voting communities in terms of their demographics, political leanings, and voting behavior?
Sumi v.
Young (1937) is a Supreme Court case involving a contest over the appointment of a guardian for two minor children in Alaska.
The case was argued before the Supreme Court on February 3, 1937, and the Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court in a 9-0 decision.
The case originated from the Alaska U.S.
District Court and was presented before the Supreme Court with a motion that averred no question arising under the Constitution, statute, or treaty of the United States was involved.
The petitioner in the case was not a party in the Probate Court where the contest over the guardian appointment took place.
The Supreme Court opinion was delivered by Mr.
Justice McREYNOLDS, who upheld the lower court's decision.
The case has been cited in various legal databases and is available for research on websites such as FindLaw, Cornell Law School, and Justia.
The case involved a controversy over the appointment of a guardian for two minor children in the Probate Court, Fairbanks, Alaska, in October 1934.
Upon motion, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
The motion averred that no monetary value exceeding $1,000 was involved in the case.
The case has been discussed in legal forums and blogs, with legal scholars analyzing the Court's decision and its implications for probate law.
The case has been used as a precedent in subsequent cases involving the jurisdiction of federal courts in probate matters.
The case highlights the importance of understanding the jurisdiction of federal and state courts in resolving disputes.
The case also underscores the need for proper legal representation in probate matters, especially when contesting the appointment of a guardian.
The case is an essential read for legal professionals, scholars, and students interested in probate law, federal court jurisdiction, and civil procedure.
The case highlights the significance of adhering to legal procedures and requirements when filing motions and appeals in court.
The case is an example of the Supreme Court's role in interpreting and applying the law in specific cases.
The case demonstrates the importance of careful consideration of legal issues and arguments presented before the Court.
The case is an essential reference for understanding the historical context of probate law and federal court jurisdiction.
The case is an example of the Supreme Court's role in upholding the rule of law and ensuring justice for all.
The case is a testament to the enduring significance of legal precedents in shaping the law and resolving legal disputes.
eDiscovery, legal research and legal memo creation - ready to be sent to your counterparty? Get it done in a heartbeat with AI. (Get started for free)