eDiscovery, legal research and legal memo creation - ready to be sent to your counterparty? Get it done in a heartbeat with AI. (Get started for free)

How did the Supreme Court's decision in RAY HALUCH GRAVEL CO. v. CENTRAL PENSION FUND OF impact employee benefit plans governed by state law?

The case involved a construction company, Ray Haluch Gravel Co., and a multiemployer pension fund, Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers.

The Supreme Court's decision in 2016 held that a company that withdraws from a multiemployer pension fund is not required to contribute to the fund to make up for the fund's losses due to the company's withdrawal.

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) governs employee benefit plans in the United States, and the Supreme Court based its decision on ERISA's withdrawal liability provisions.

The Central Pension Fund's agreement with Ray Haluch Gravel Co.

did not include a provision requiring the company to make up for the fund's losses.

The Supreme Court's decision reversed the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which had ruled in favor of the Central Pension Fund.

The case involved a collective bargaining agreement that directed Ray Haluch Gravel Co.

to remit contributions to several benefit funds affiliated with the International Union of Operating Engineers.

Ray Haluch Gravel Co.

was a landscape supply company that was required to pay contributions to union-affiliated benefit funds under the collective bargaining agreement.

The Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers was one of the beneficiaries of the collective bargaining agreement.

The case was significant because it clarified the obligations of employers who withdraw from multiemployer pension funds.

The Supreme Court's decision was unanimous, with all nine justices agreeing on the outcome.

The case was argued before the Supreme Court on December 9, 2013, and the Court issued its decision on January 15, 2014.

The Supreme Court's decision was written by Justice Clarence Thomas, who was joined by all eight other justices.

The case involved a complex set of facts, including a collective bargaining agreement, pension fund contributions, and withdrawal liability provisions.

The case had significant implications for employers and pension funds across the United States, as it clarified the obligations of employers who withdraw from multiemployer pension funds.

The Supreme Court's decision in Ray Haluch Gravel Co.

v.

Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers has been cited in numerous subsequent court decisions and legal analyses.

eDiscovery, legal research and legal memo creation - ready to be sent to your counterparty? Get it done in a heartbeat with AI. (Get started for free)