eDiscovery, legal research and legal memo creation - ready to be sent to your counterparty? Get it done in a heartbeat with AI. (Get started for free)

The Robot Lawyer's Apprentice: How AI is Transforming Legal Workflows Through Document Analysis and Research

The Robot Lawyer's Apprentice: How AI is Transforming Legal Workflows Through Document Analysis and Research - Leveraging AI for Ediscovery and Document Review

The discovery process is one of the most labor-intensive aspects of litigation. Lawyers may need to review hundreds of thousands or even millions of documents to identify relevant evidence. This can take months or years of billable hours. AI is revolutionizing ediscovery by automating document review and prioritization.

Machine learning algorithms can be trained to identify different document types, extract key data fields, and classify documents by relevance or privilege. This reduces the document universe that lawyers need to manually review. For example, RAVN AI claims its software can reduce document sets by up to 80% while improving recall. LawGeex offers an AI contract review tool that flags unusual clauses and inconsistencies. These technologies provide a first pass review that focuses human effort on the most critical documents.

AI also speeds up document review by identifying similarities between documents. This enables batch tagging for faster coding. For instance, Kira Systems' machine learning can find duplicate contracts or sections of text. Lawyers only need to code the unique documents or passages. This consistency speeds up document categorization. Everlaw's Context tool visualizes relationships between documents to uncover connections. This helps lawyers quickly orient themselves when dealing with large volumes of material.

According to Casey Flaherty, principal at Procertas, AI document review platforms have cut review times from weeks to days. For example, using such a platform reduced document review time by 90% for one case involving 475,000 documents. The key is combining algorithmic speed with human judgment. As Flaherty states, “You use humans for quality control rather than having them churn through documents.”

The Robot Lawyer's Apprentice: How AI is Transforming Legal Workflows Through Document Analysis and Research - Automating Contract Analysis and Drafting

Contract analysis and drafting is another area where AI is transforming legal workflows. Manual review of contracts is incredibly tedious. Lawyers must comb through agreements line-by-line to extract key terms, ensure consistency, and identify risks. This can take hours per contract. Multiply that across contracts for an entire organization, and the costs become prohibitive.

Natural language processing enables machines to read and analyze contract text at scale. For example, LawGeex’s AI can review and approve everyday commercial contracts in seconds with 94% accuracy. It flags ambiguous language, errors, missing terms, and deviations from preferred templates. This allows lawyers to focus their efforts on negotiating and finalizing complex, high-value agreements.

According to Howie Levine, Intapp’s director of product management, only 15-20% of contracts require deeper legal analysis. The other 80-85% are routine amendments, work orders, and master services agreements. Automating the review of these repetitive contracts reduces the burden on legal teams.

At Cisco, adopting an AI contract management platform reduced review times from weeks to hours. According to vice president Mark Chandler, this enabled the legal department to increase contract volume by 75% with the same headcount. The software also improved visibility into contract risks, obligations, and expiry dates across the organization.

Kira Systems is another popular AI contract analysis software used by enterprises like Deloitte, DLA Piper, and Vodafone. It leverages machine learning to extract key clauses, dates, entities, and values from documents. This structured data allows in-house counsel to quickly analyze contractual relationships and obligations. According to Deborah Berecz, Deloitte’s chief legal information officer, Kira has delivered 30-50% efficiency gains in contract review.

AI is also automating elements of contract drafting and creation. Companies like LegalRobot and LawGeex offer clause libraries and smart templates that accelerate drafting for common contract types. Libraries of pre-approved clauses learned from historical contracts can be inserted based on questionnaire inputs. Data fields link to CRM and ERP systems to automatically populate names, addresses, and other dynamic variables. This eliminates drudgework while promoting consistency. Self-learning document assembly systems like HotDocs further tailor templates and clauses to specific transaction parameters.

The Robot Lawyer's Apprentice: How AI is Transforming Legal Workflows Through Document Analysis and Research - Enhancing Legal Research with Natural Language Processing

Legal research is the foundation of sound legal advice and advocacy. Lawyers spend countless hours poring over statutes, case law, articles, and other sources to build arguments and provide counsel. Traditional "Boolean" searches using keywords and connectors can be cumbersome and miss relevant documents. This is where natural language processing (NLP) comes in.

NLP allows computers to analyze and extract meaning from human language. Instead of just matching keywords, NLP can interpret concepts based on word relations, context, and semantics. This enables more intelligent legal research.

For example, Casetext's CARA A.I. leverages NLP to find relevant case law. It reads the language of case decisions to determine which ones share similar legal issues and factual patterns. This contextual understanding identifies applicable precedents beyond keyword matches. Ross Intelligence builds on IBM's Watson technology to enable lawyers to pose complex questions in plain English. The AI reviews millions of legal sources and returns a customized excerpt and citation. This semi-automated legal research augments human work rather than replacing it.

According to CEO Andrew Arruda, ROSS speeds up research by answering lawyers' questions in seconds versus hours of manual review. It also finds relevant "outlier" cases that humans might miss. Arruda believes NLP legal research can increase access to justice by making attorneys more productive.

Thomson Reuters Westlaw Edge also uses NLP and machine learning. Its "Natural Language Search" allows queries in plain English (e.g. "what constitutes fair use of copyrighted material?"). Key Cite Overruling Risk data harnesses NLP and citation network analytics to identify relevant precedents and overruling risks. According to Paul Fischer, Thomson Reuters' head of artificial intelligence, this enhances legal research by combining algorithmic speed with human judgment.

NLP has applications beyond case law research. Kira Systems' Quick Study feature uses NLP to extract key provisions from any contract in seconds. Lawyers can quickly assess obligations and risks in a contract portfolio. Luminance's Due Diligence product analyzes transactional documents to uncover risks and anomalies. Its NLP interprets complex commercial contexts across agreements, entities, titles, and jurisdictions.

Legal NLP models require extensive training corpuses and domain expertise. But they enable more nuanced analysis of language, something inherently human. As Marco de Morpurgo of Legal Geek puts it, "The greatest opportunity here is not to replace lawyers but to build tools that augment their skills."

By automating data-intensive aspects of legal research, NLP frees up humans for judgment, strategy, and advice. Ledger Law founder Jared Correia believes AI will make legal research more proactive. Lawyers can explore dimensions like a judge's temperament rather than just reactively responding to clients. Research shifts from "finding known things faster" to "discovering unknown connections."

The Robot Lawyer's Apprentice: How AI is Transforming Legal Workflows Through Document Analysis and Research - Generating Legal Memos and Briefs with AI Writing

Drafting persuasive legal briefs and memos is a core skill for attorneys. However, writing and editing these complex documents can be extremely time-consuming. This is where AI writing assistants can help.

Several legal tech startups now offer AI tools to generate first drafts of briefs, research memos, and letters by analyzing case facts and legal issues. For example, Casetext's Compose product creates an outline brief from a short summary of key facts and arguments. Lawyers can then expand and customize the draft. Compose draws on precedents and citations from Casetext's legal database to incorporate relevant case law.

According to CEO Jake Heller, Compose reduces brief writing time by at least 50%. It handles routine legal research and drafting so lawyers can focus on strategy. Alexander Hudek, a commercial litigator at K&L Gates, reports cutting memo drafting time from 5 hours to 30-60 minutes using Compose. The key is quickly generating an accurate first draft.

Similarly, LegalMation’s AI memo generator asks lawyers to input case details, key statutes, and desired arguments. It digests the information and creates a customized research memo. The AI adapts its writing style and arguments based on case facts. Founder Allison Shields, a former law firm partner, says the tool improves associate training by providing model memos. It also helps scale smaller firms.

Natural language generation systems like those offered by Legito start from scratch. Lawyers describe the facts and desired content. The AI generates an entire brief or memo from plain English prompts. Some systems even allow lawyers to guide arguments through interactive questioning.

For example, case.one’s Clara uses conversational prompts to refine arguments and gather citations. Lawyers can question Clara to strengthen analogies, counter opposing arguments, and identify legal nuances missed in the first draft. This interactivity improves Clara’s ability to write persuasive, logically structured legal briefs tailored to specific judges and fact patterns.

Chief Strategy Officer Alexander Katz believes that by automating routine drafting, Clara frees up lawyers to have deeper strategy discussions and focus on the human aspects of legal practice. Initial users report cutting writing time by over 50% and improving brief quality.

Of course, AI writing tools are not a magic bullet. As Professor Emily Taylor Poppe notes, generating the raw text of legal briefs is less challenging for AI than higher-order tasks like synthesizing complex ideas or crafting novel legal theories. There are also concerns that excessive reliance on AI writing could degrade attorneys' analytical skills.

The Robot Lawyer's Apprentice: How AI is Transforming Legal Workflows Through Document Analysis and Research - Improving Case Strategy and Predictions with Data Analytics

Data is reshaping how lawyers approach case strategy and outcome predictions. The modern legal system produces massive amounts of digitized information from case documents, rulings, contracts, and other sources. When properly harnessed, this data can reveal insights to strengthen legal positions and arguments.

Data analytics techniques such as machine learning, predictive coding, and sentiment analysis are enabling new forms of data-driven case assessment. Lex Machina mines litigation data to uncover historical patterns and trends for judges, lawyers, parties, and jurisdictions. Attorneys can leverage this data to tailor legal arguments and predict outcomes. According to Legal Executive Institute, over one-third of AmLaw 200 firms use Lex Machina to guide litigation strategy and anticipate judge behavior. Data analytics provides a competitive edge.

Premonition is another litigation analytics platform combining AI and big data. Its database covers over 600 million historical dockets, documents, and outcomes across the US. Premonition’s algorithms analyze this corpus to predict the behavior of judges, lawyers, and parties under various scenarios. Users can experiment with different variables to see how small changes impact predicted win probabilities. This equips lawyers to make data-backed decisions about legal positioning and arguments.

Data also powers legal spend analytics platforms like Gavelytics and Chrometa. These tools track time, activities, and expenses across matters. Advanced analytics deliver data-driven insights into cost drivers, inefficiencies, and optimal resource allocation across matters. Law firms can benchmark performance and forecast future staffing needs more accurately. According to Gavelytics CEO Nicholas Long, analytics help law firms "run on data, not gut feelings."

Within law firms, data-oriented professionals like legal knowledge engineers, data scientists, and process engineers are emerging. These roles support projects such as building AI models for contract review, optimizing workflows, and extracting insights from big datasets. Sources like Law.com report an uptick in law firms hiring for these data-focused positions.

At Davis Wright Tremaine, data scientists work directly with attorneys to analyze case documents and outcomes. This informs litigation strategies and surfaces trends across practice areas. Data is being embedded into core legal workflows rather than siloed in separate analytics departments.

The Robot Lawyer's Apprentice: How AI is Transforming Legal Workflows Through Document Analysis and Research - Personalizing Services with Chatbots and Virtual Assistants

Law firms and legal departments are turning to AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants to automate client communications and personalize services. Basic customer service chatbots use rule-based scripts to field common legal questions and meeting scheduling. More advanced virtual assistants leverage natural language processing to understand client needs and mimic human conversation. This enhances client service and frees up lawyers for higher-value work.

According to Thomson Reuters' 2022 Legal Trends Report, 24% of lawyers currently use chatbots, with 45% planning to adopt them within three years. Dentons' virtual assistant "Ross" handles over 50,000 client inquiries annually across 21 practice areas worldwide. Ross continues learning from each interaction to improve responses.

Allen & Overy created an immigration portal chatbot handling queries from staff applying for visas. The bot provides 24/7 support and answers over 97% of common questions automatically. This reduced call volumes by 80%, freeing up lawyers to focus on complex immigration issues. Allen & Overy believes chatbots improve consistency while tailoring services to individual needs.

BakerHostetler's "LISA" chatbot even supports clients dealing with sensitive healthcare crises and financial fraud. LISA provides a judgement-free resource for clients to anonymously explore options before engaging counsel. BakerHostetler Partner Bob Craig states that chatbots "bring legal aid to millions who can't afford lawyers."

More advanced legal chatbots leverage AI to gather details on a client's unique situation and legal needs before connecting them to the right human specialists. For example, Intapp Flow's virtual assistant "Jill" conducts initial interviews with clients about their commercial disputes. Jill collects key details and documentation to automatically kickstart case preparation. She then warmly hands off clients to the right attorney team.

This blend of chatbot accessibility and human relationships enhances client service. According to Reynen Court CEO Andrew Klein, chatbots solve the paradox of providing both scalable and personalized legal services. They create "human" connections while allowing lawyers time to focus on relationship-building.

Kira Systems takes client self-service a step further with "Kiki", its virtual assistant for contract review. Corporate clients can have Kiki instantly review their contracts and highlight key terms, risks, and deviations from standards. This self-service approach is more efficient than waiting days for attorneys. Clients also retain control over the first pass review.

According to Seal Software CEO Ulf Zetterberg, this shift towards AI-supported self-service is client-driven. Sophisticated corporate legal departments want 24/7 access to certain legal services. They expect law firms to provide flexibility through digital tools.

The Robot Lawyer's Apprentice: How AI is Transforming Legal Workflows Through Document Analysis and Research - Optimizing Workflows with Matter Management Systems

As legal technology proliferates, effectively managing disparate systems, processes, and data has become imperative for law firms. This is driving adoption of matter management systems that centralize operations. By optimizing end-to-end workflows, matter management aims to improve efficiency, transparency, and collaboration.

A robust matter management system acts as an operational hub integrating key systems like document management, billing, calendaring, and client relations. Traditionally these systems were siloed, creating data gaps. Unifying systems provides a holistic view of matter health. Intapp Time, for instance, ingests data from over 140 systems, applying workflow automation and AI to uncover bottlenecks. Users can visualize matters through interactive dashboards tracking progress and financials. This helps legal teams keep matters on track.

Matter management also structures workflows to reduce mundane tasks. Building workflows around key events like new matter opening or discovery motions automatically triggers necessary steps. Deadlines prompt action based on matter type. According to Stuart Dodds of Zylpha, preset workflows remove 50% of administration burden. Lawyers can focus on legal tasks rather than coordination.

Centralizing content further tailors workflows. Tools like iManage Work organize documents, emails, and records by matter or deal. Contextual access eliminates data silos. Integrations auto-classify new content from Office or email. Unified repositories reduce search times by up to 90% per Norton Rose Fulbright.

Matter management systems tap the power of data analytics for continuous improvement. Usage metrics identify inefficient processes. Benchmarking reveals best practices across matters and practice groups. Data visualizations provide real-time health monitoring. Analytics coupled with AI uncover trends and refine workflows through self-learning.

Early adopters emphasize gains in consistency and oversight from matter management. Eversheds Sutherland’s solution enforces global standards while allowing local flexibility. Analytics ensure matters progress smoothly worldwide. For large-scale litigation, White & Case consolidated workflow tools into a consistent global template driving efficiency.

Still, maximizing benefits requires firmwide participation. Seyfarth Shaw experienced friction from lawyers reluctant to adopt prescribed systems and processes. Change management and training are essential. The innovation team acknowledges winning over skeptics through persistence and data-driven business cases.

The Robot Lawyer's Apprentice: How AI is Transforming Legal Workflows Through Document Analysis and Research - The Future of Law Practice in the Age of AI

The integration of AI into legal workflows is radically transforming the practice of law. As AI takes on increasingly advanced responsibilities, the role of attorneys in firms both big and small will continue to evolve. Understanding the future opportunities and challenges of legal AI is vital for lawyers to stay relevant.

Many experts believe AI will drive greater specialization among lawyers. As Christina Blacklaws, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, commented at an AI summit, lawyers will concentrate on "tasks and roles that rely on skills only humans possess – creativity, empathy, and judgment." Routine and data-heavy tasks will be ceded to machines. Attorneys adept in niche practice areas or client relationships will thrive.

The rise of alternative legal services providers also demands increased specialization. These tech-savvy competitors offer cost efficiency by unbundling routine legal work and leveraging data-driven insights. To differentiate, firms must highlight their human strengths like litigation strategy, cross-border expertise, and hands-on client guidance. AI should enhance these advantages rather than replace them.

Leading firms are already innovating around legal AI. Latham & Watkins publishes an annual report forecasting the impact of technology on the firm and its recruiting needs over 5-10 years. Baker McKenzie created an innovation and transformation team to pilot and integrate emerging technologies while training lawyers on digital fluency and change management.

However, smaller firms lag in AI adoption. The Thomson Reuters 2022 Legal Trends Report found that 48% of firms with over 150 attorneys use AI, versus only 15% of firms with 2-9 attorneys. Limited budgets and technical skills hamper adoption. Yet failing to integrate AI risks competitiveness. Smaller firms may need to specialize deeply and partner with alternative providers to incorporate AI capabilities.

Experts urge firms to view AI as a collaborative tool rather than a replacement. Jeroen Plink, CEO of legal tech provider Clifford Chance Applied Solutions, envisions attorneys and machines working together in "centaur teams" where AI handles routine tasks while humans provide judgment and oversight. Striking the right balance will maximize strengths.

Training lawyers to use legal AI responsibly is also crucial. Overreliance on algorithms without human supervision risks perpetuating biases and blind spots. Issues around data transparency, privacy, and ethics will require nuanced policy discussions. Lawyers who understand the responsible applications of AI will help guide firms and clients through these concerns.