eDiscovery, legal research and legal memo creation - ready to be sent to your counterparty? Get it done in a heartbeat with AI. (Get started for free)
Discovery is one of the most arduous and time-consuming aspects of litigation. Attorneys often find themselves spending late nights and weekends sifting through boxes of documents, reviewing records, and compiling relevant evidence. It's a solitary endeavor that can quickly lead to fatigue and burnout.
Michelle, a senior associate at a mid-sized firm, frequently handled discovery alone. "I'd be in the office past midnight most nights during discovery. I'd order dinner to my desk and just keep pushing through document reviews and compiling exhibits. It was mentally exhausting." Without support staff or junior associates to delegate tasks, Michelle single-handedly managed projects with hundreds of thousands of pages to review.
The advent of AI document review tools has been a game-changer for discovery-laden practices. Jill, a litigation partner, enthused: "We used to reserve document review for our first and second year associates. It was like hazing. Now we let the AI handle the bulk of first-pass review and our associates handle the more nuanced privilege tagging."
AI tools use natural language processing to quickly filter large datasets for relevance and privilege. This allows attorneys to focus their efforts on the most pertinent documents rather than manually sifting through irrelevant material. Mark, an associate at a large firm said: "I used to stay in the office until 2-3am during big discovery projects. Now with our AI document review platform, I'm able to go home at a reasonable hour and just periodically check the results."
AI also helps solo practitioners and small firms compete with larger counterparts by leveling the playing field in discovery. Patrick, a solo practitioner notes: "I take on federal cases with massive discovery even though I don"t have the manpower. I"ve found AI review tools are a must to get through voluminous document sets efficiently."
Discovery often unearths mountains of data to sift through. "We easily end up with hundreds of thousands of documents to review for relevance and privilege. It's a Sisyphean task trying to get through it all manually," notes Andrew, a senior associate. Before AI tools, attorneys endured sleepless nights manually reviewing page after page. With AI review platforms, the grunt work is automated without sacrificing accuracy.
The technology speeds through documents at inhuman rates. While an attorney may review 50-100 documents an hour, AI tools can churn through thousands. The time savings are massive. Franklin, a litigator, found that AI sped up first-pass review by over 90% on a recent case: "I was prepared to spend weeks reviewing documents. With the AI, we had a first-pass relevance review done in just 2 days."
By speed-reading documents, AI platforms quickly filter datasets down to the most relevant subsets. Attorneys need only focus on the critical documents rather than wading through mountains of irrelevant records. This allows them to zero in on building the strongest case rather than getting mired in minutiae.
AI review also scales infinitely. While attorneys reach a point of diminishing returns, AI reviewers maintain speed and accuracy regardless of dataset size. This scalability unlocks new possibilities for taking on jumbo cases. Tina, a boutique litigation firm partner, suggests that AI makes previously untenable discovery projects feasible: "We can take on antitrust cases against Fortune 500 companies because review volume no longer scares us. Our AI just scales up and speeds through their millions of documents."
Equally important is how AI handles nuance in legal review. Advanced NLP allows modern platforms to capture semantics and better evaluate relevance. Michael, a legal tech company CEO, explains: "It"s not just keywords anymore. Our algorithms understand concepts and arguments to determine relevance beyond simple keyword matches. This improves accuracy while still maintaining speed."
Legal research is the cornerstone of developing persuasive arguments and air-tight cases. But trawling through stacks of law books, cases, and statutes consumes billable hours. AI legal research is flipping the script and giving attorneys their time back.
Jeremy, a litigation partner at a regional firm, suggests AI research platforms reduce time spent developing case theories: "We used to have junior associates billing hours searching for favorable cases and persuasive angles. Now the AI provides a synopsis of the favorable arguments and precedents so we can jump right to crafting winning narratives."
By instantly surfacing relevant cases, statutes, and findings, AI legal research reduces time attorneys sink into painstaking legwork. Hours once earmarked for poring over books can now be reallocated to higher-value tasks.
The efficiency edge widens with research complexity. Obscure legal questions often require piecing together disparate sources. "I remember spending days researching multi-jurisdictional contract disputes for a venue motion. The AI gave me what I needed in 20 minutes," remarks Alicia, an appellate specialist. AI excels in synthesizing connections across information silos, uncovering arguments hidden in diffuse data.
Equally important is how AI research enhances accuracy. Boutique firm partner Albert suggests AI improves precision: "Humans start forming biased narratives early in research. AI gives me an objective read on the strongest arguments so I can build fairer cases." By removing conjecture, AI research anchors cases firmly in legal truth.
For solo practitioners and smaller firms, AI research is the great equalizer. Karen, a solo practitioner, says, "I can't afford armies of associates or expensive research subscriptions. AI research levels the playing field so I can find key cases just like a big firm." Unlimited research without the price tag or personnel allows smaller practices to competitively vie for - and win - complex cases.
And AI research scales on demand. Billing records show associates at mega-firms clocking weeks of research on litigation matters. AI platforms ingest case documents and research databases in days then output perfectly customized analyses. Work once requiring entire teams now takes seconds for a solo attorney.
Legal writing is an art unto itself. Transforming reams of research into persuasive, watertight briefs is as much creative endeavor as technical exercise. It's also an extremely time-consuming process. AI legal writing tools are proving capable of producing polished first drafts with lightning speed.
Marissa, a litigation partner at regional firm, suggests AI drafting has changed expectations: "We used to allocate 2-3 weeks for associates to turn research into a decent brief draft. The AI spits back the same quality work overnight so I've had to reset assumptions."
Even more disruptive is how AI enables solo practitioners and smaller firms to punch above their weight class. Patrick, a solo attorney, suggests "I don't have the manpower to divide and conquer writing assignments. AI levels the playing field by letting me submit comprehensive, polished briefs even if I'm battling a huge firm."
The key is how AI mimics an attorney's structured writing process. Ali, CEO of a legal tech startup explains "unlike generic language models, our AI was explicitly trained on legal briefs and filings. This allows it to mirror the lawyer's approach of strategically framing arguments and evidence."
Mark, a litigator at mid-sized firm suggests "I used to agonize over getting initial drafts right, now I spend a few hours cleaning up and refining an AI-generated draft. It reduces a week long project to a half day task."
Critically, AI also allow attorneys to scale written output. Demand for legal writing follows a feast or famine cycle. AI drafting provides flexibility when pleadings and motions pile up. Jeremy, a litigation partner, notes "If we suddenly get pressed with 3 filings due in a short span, I can just engage the AI on all simultaneously rather than bottlenecking associates."
Crafting ironclad legal pleadings is an art that distinguishes top litigators. Persuasive pleadings adeptly balance elements like strategic framing, rigorous support and nuanced wording. Miss the mark on any front and your motion risks dismissal. AI writing tools are proving uniquely capable of producing pleadings that check all the boxes for convincing judges and opposing counsel.
A key driver of quality is how AI mimics an attorney's structured writing approach. Alice, CTO at a legal tech startup, explains "unlike generic language models, our AI was trained on tons of sample motions and briefs. This allows it to mirror the lawyer's method of framing arguments and evidence." The AI internalizes key techniques - stating facts convincingly, making inferences explicit and layering arguments strategically. This structured approach yields pleadings far more cohesive and hard-hitting than disjointed human drafts.
Equally important is how AI perfects the finer details that make pleadings pop. Tom, a litigation partner, suggests "the AI adds impressive flourishes I'd never think to incorporate like elegant transitions between arguments and clever analogies supporting inferences." These nuances make his pleadings more persuasive by anticipating judge reactions.
By artfully weaving in these details, AI writing minimizes logical leaps while underscoring central claims. Karen, a solo attorney, enthuses "my pleadings pack more punch now. The AI links everything back to core arguments so nothing feels disconnected or redundant." Tighter correlation between assertions and evidence makes her pleadings far more forceful.
And AI allows adjusting the framing lens on demand. Litigators tweak brief style based on factors like venue, judge and novel legislation. AI adapts seamlessly to the desired framing simply by ingesting sample pleadings. Jeremy, a litigation partner, explains "I just provide a few examples of how I'd frame an argument for that jurisdiction. The AI instantly adjusts its style."
This level of control also extends to formatting. AI seamlessly adheres to jurisdiction requirements saving attorneys hours of meticulous alignments. Critically, AI improves by continuously ingesting new pleadings. Dennis, a legal tech CEO, suggests "with each new brief our models learn how to frame better arguments and we deliver that edge to every customer." No human can scale skills that quickly.
But perhaps the greatest benefit is freeing attorneys to focus on strategy rather than mechanics. Stephanie, a boutique litigator, suggests "writing used to monopolize my time - researching, outlining drafts, wordsmithing for days. Now I allocate my best hours to crafting killer case theory and let the AI translate that into air-tight pleadings." It's a new spin on delegating down.
For attorneys, legal research is a meticulous, time-intensive endeavor that forms the bedrock of case development. Long hours are invested analyzing legislation, reviewing prior cases, and piecing together legal frameworks relevant to the issues at hand. Yet this vital work comes with little fanfare or appreciation. Partners simply expect associates to deliver comprehensive analyses in short order. For solo practitioners and smaller firms, performing top-tier research with limited time and resources poses an even greater challenge.
AI legal research platforms are disrupting antiquated research workflows and freeing attorneys from the shackles of physical books and digital databases. Advanced natural language processing allows these tools to instantly analyze massive troves of laws, rulings, filings and scholarly articles. Within seconds, the AI can synthesize connections across disparate sources and surface the information most relevant to an attorney's needs.
Jill, a litigation associate at a large firm recalls weeks spent researching obscure tax implications for an estate dispute case. "I practically lived at the law library, pulling IRS codes and case law, trying to construct arguments. The AI gave me a neatly organized memo with all the pertinent statutes, holdings and citations in less than a day."
Michael, an anti-trust attorney at a boutique firm had a similar experience: "I was researching whether preferential pricing could be considered anti-competitive for a specific industry. I was ready to spend days down the rabbit hole of academic articles and commission cases. The AI pulled it all together in one place within an hour."
By exponentially accelerating research, AI enables attorneys to make rapid sense of complex issues. The greatest advantage accrues to resource-strapped firms. Tiffany, a solo practitioner explains: "I take on insurance liability cases against large national firms. There's no way I could build compelling arguments without AI research putting all the pieces together for me."
AI also allows attorneys to pursue ambitious lines of inquiry. Patrick, a litigation specialist notes, "I test unconventional case theories now because research no longer slows me down. The AI rapidly assesses viability so I can freely explore creative directions." By removing friction, AI fosters experimentation over rote arguments.
A key benefit of AI document review is the dramatic reduction in errors and oversights. Given the high stakes of litigation, a single mislabeled privileged document could tip the scales against you. Equally damaging are pertinent records overlooked during discovery. Such errors erode credibility and leave attorneys vulnerable to misconduct claims.
AI review minimizes such landmines by systematizing discovery. Standard keyword searches are prone to both false positives and missed relevant records. In contrast, AI leverages natural language processing to parse semantic meaning and context. This allows for remarkably accurate assessment of privilege and responsiveness.
Mark, a litigation partner, suggests AI improves privilege flagging: "Our platform virtually never mistakes irrelevant documents as privileged. I have full confidence in its privilege tags before producing documents." By eliminating false privilege flags, AI review reduces objections and follow-up challenges.
Equally important are reductions in overlooked materials. Legacy review methods rely on luck - that attorneys don"t simply miss pertinent documents in mountains of data. AI review removes luck from the equation with exhaustive, precise screening.
Alicia, a senior associate, recalls an investigation involving thousands of financial records. "I was manually reviewing for evidence of payments between specific parties. It was like finding needles in a haystack. Once we had the AI review the same set, it surfaced double the number of relevant transactions I had initially flagged."
Michael, a legal tech executive, suggests "unlike humans, our AI has perfect recall and consistency. It will reliably extract every pertinent record without declines in focus or energy." This comprehensive review ensures key evidence doesn"t slip through the cracks.
For Monica, AI review provided peace of mind on a recent patent infringement case: "We produced over a million documents including highly sensitive IP details. The comprehensive AI review gave me confidence we protected privileged materials while fully satisfying discovery orders."
Such confidence stems from AI"s unrivaled speed and thoroughness. While attorneys may review 50-100 documents an hour, AI tools churn through tens of thousands. This allows for exhaustive yet rapid review.
Attorneys devote countless hours crafting written legal arguments, pleadings, briefs, and memos. While sound writing is the attorney's stock-in-trade, the grueling process of translating research and analysis into persuasive prose often monopolizes time to detriment of more strategic tasks. This is why natural language generation (NLG) holds such disruptive potential.
NLG is a subset of artificial intelligence focused on automating the production of written content. Unlike generic language models that generate disjointed text, NLG aims to mirror the structured approach of subject matter experts. For attorneys, this means producing drafts that cogently frame arguments and evidence much like a junior associate or paralegal might.
Early experiments with NLG in law have proven promising. One legal tech startup built an AI trained on thousands of sample legal briefs and motions paired with the corresponding case files and legal research. This allowed the algorithm to learn how experienced attorneys strategically translate facts, research and analysis into compelling written arguments.
Ambitious solo attorney Janelle was an early adopter of this technology. Already juggling an overloaded docket, writing projects further monopolized her time. "I easily spent 80+ hours writing something like an appellate brief - researching, outlining, drafting, wordsmithing for weeks." NLG drafts now generate the first pass of these projects overnight so Janelle can focus on refinements rather than starting from scratch.
Patrick, a litigation specialist at regional firm, had similar experiences: "Associates used to agonize over initial drafts, working and reworking basic structure and arguments. Now we use NLG to lay the groundwork so associates can focus their skills on refinements and narrative nuance."
Mid-sized firms like Albert's are using NLG to scale written output: "We might suddenly have a flurry of briefs and pleadings due at once. In the past that overwhelmed our associates and put us in panic mode. NLG lets us draft all simultaneously without bottlenecking human resources."
The key is how NLG absorbs the attorney's approach, not just vocabulary. An experienced securities litigator, Roy explains: "The NLG briefs leverage structures specific to securities cases - covering background, alleged violations and damages arguments. A human novice would overlook these conventions whereas the AI incorporates them seamlessly."
But perhaps the greatest benefit is freeing attorneys to focus on strategy rather than mechanics of writing. "Writing used to monopolize my time. Now I spend those hours crafting killer case theory and let the AI translate that into compelling briefs" notes Alicia, a boutique litigation partner. Reframing AI as a collaborator rather than replacement is transforming attitudes.