eDiscovery, legal research and legal memo creation - ready to be sent to your counterparty? Get it done in a heartbeat with AI. (Get started for free)
What is the significance of the various court cases listed in this key phrase, and how do they relate to one another in terms of jurisdiction and legal precedence?
The case of Knox County Court v.
United States ex Rel.
Harshman, 109 U.S.
229 (1883) is a Supreme Court decision that involves a mandamus proceeding against the justices of the county court of Knox County, Missouri.
The case originated from the Missouri US Circuit Court for all Districts of Missouri, and the Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court.
The case involved a judgment of $77,374.46 obtained by the relator, Harshman, against the county in the circuit court for the Eastern district of Missouri.
The judgment was for bonds and coupons, and the case confirmed that bonds of the character of those involved are debts of the county.
For any balance remaining due on account of principal or interest after the application of the proceeds of the special tax of one-twentieth of 1 per cent, the holders were entitled to payment out of the general funds of the county raised by taxation for ordinary use after exhausting the special fund.
The case adheres to the rulings in United States v Clark County 96 U.S.
211, United States v Macon County 99 U.S.
582, 99 U.S.
589, and Macon County v Huidekoper 99 U.S.
592.
The majority of the court affirmed the ruling of the lower court in a 9-0 decision.
The case was argued before the court on October 26, 1883, and the decision was handed down on November 12, 1883.
The case involved county bonds that recited upon their face that they had been issued under the provisions of the charter of a railroad company.
The case confirmed that under section 17 of the general railroad law, the county court of a county was authorized to subscribe to the stock of railroad companies, even if they were created by special charter.
The case established an important precedent regarding the payment of debts of a county, especially those involving bonds and coupons.
The case illustrates the significant role of the Supreme Court in interpreting federal laws and establishing legal precedents.
eDiscovery, legal research and legal memo creation - ready to be sent to your counterparty? Get it done in a heartbeat with AI. (Get started for free)