Automate legal research, eDiscovery, and precedent analysis - Let our AI Legal Assistant handle the complexity. (Get started now)

What is the significance of the STURM v. BOKER et al. legal case?

The case originated as an action at law filed by the appellant, Sturm, in the superior court of Marion County, Indiana, against the defendants (Boker et al.) to recover $238,000 plus interest.

The Supreme Court reversed the lower court's ruling and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion.

The case was argued before the Supreme Court on October 13, 1893, and the Court reached an 8-0 ruling.

The Supreme Court found that Sturm's testimony concerning the extent of his legal ownership of goods was merely a "statement of opinion" rather than a factual claim.

The case is significant in establishing the principle that a party's own testimony about the extent of their legal ownership is not necessarily determinative, especially when contract language is at issue.

The case can be found in various legal databases and sources, such as the Cornell Law School's Supreme Court collection, Ballotpedia, CourtListener, and the Library of Congress's U.S.

Reports collection.

The Supreme Court's decision in STURM v.

BOKER et al.

has been cited in numerous subsequent cases, highlighting its ongoing legal significance.

The case dealt with complex issues of contract interpretation and the weight given to a party's own testimony about their legal rights and obligations.

The Supreme Court's unanimous ruling suggests a strong consensus among the Justices on the legal principles at stake in the case.

The case provides insight into the Supreme Court's approach to resolving commercial disputes and the role of testimony versus contract language in such matters.

STURM v.

BOKER et al.

has been analyzed by legal scholars and commentators for its implications on the treatment of a party's own statements about their legal position.

The case remains an important precedent in contract law and the interpretation of legal rights and obligations, even over a century after it was decided.

Automate legal research, eDiscovery, and precedent analysis - Let our AI Legal Assistant handle the complexity. (Get started now)