eDiscovery, legal research and legal memo creation - ready to be sent to your counterparty? Get it done in a heartbeat with AI. (Get started for free)

"What can you tell me about the legal case between GOULD, INC. and First Trust Company of St. Paul, Minnesota vs. Robert J. Adams and others?"

The case involved a disputed real estate property located in Dakota County, Minnesota, which is situated about 15 miles south of Minneapolis.

Gould, Inc.

and First Trust Company of St.

Paul, Minnesota argued that they were the rightful owners of the property, while Adams and the other defendants claimed that they had acquired ownership through adverse possession.

Adverse possession is a legal concept that allows someone to claim ownership of a property if they have possessed it for a certain period, usually 15 years, without the owner's permission.

The case was heard in the Fourth Judicial District Court of Minnesota, which is one of the busiest courts in the state.

Judge Philip Bush ruled in favor of Gould, Inc.

and First Trust Company of St.

Paul, Minnesota on May 22, 2007, finding that they had provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate their ownership of the property.

The defendants failed to prove that they had possessed the property for the required 15-year statutory period necessary to claim ownership through adverse possession.

The case eventually made its way to the Supreme Court of the United States, where the petition for a writ of certiorari was denied on January 7, 1985.

This ruling meant that the Supreme Court declined to review the case, and the decision of the lower court stood.

Gould, Inc.

was once a leading defense contractor in the Cleveland area, established in 1918 in Minnesota, and primarily involved in automotive and industrial products.

The First Trust Company of St.

Paul, Minnesota, was a trustee of the Gould, Inc.

pension trust for hourly employees and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, a U.S.

government agency that protects pension benefits.

The case is cited in several other court opinions, including a 1982 case in the U.S.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and a 1984 case in the U.S.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

The case is also mentioned in legal databases and citators, such as Casetext and CourtListener, which provide legal research tools and databases for lawyers and legal professionals.

eDiscovery, legal research and legal memo creation - ready to be sent to your counterparty? Get it done in a heartbeat with AI. (Get started for free)