# What was the outcome of the CITY NAT. BANK v. HUNTER case

legalpdf.io · August 4, 2026

> The outcome of the CITY NAT. BANK v. HUNTER case was a ruling in favor of Hunter, Evans & Co. and against the City National Bank of Fort Worth. The...

The outcome of the CITY NAT. BANK v. HUNTER case was a ruling in favor of Hunter, Evans & Co. and against the City National Bank of Fort Worth. The case involved a dispute between the two parties over a business arrangement made in February 1879, where Hunter, Evans & Co. agreed to provide John Ox27Neal with funds to buy cattle. The bank had honored Ox27Neal's checks, but later refused to settle his accounts, leading to a legal battle between the parties. The Supreme Court of the United States heard the case and issued a ruling in March 1889, ordering the City National Bank of Fort Worth to pay Hunter, Evans & Co. the sum of $12,984.85, plus interest at a rate of eight percent per annum. The case was then remanded to the lower court for further proceedings in conformity with the Supreme Court's ruling.

**Also worth reading:** [What are the implications of the recent Supreme Court case and what do experts think about its outcome?](https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/what_are_the_implications_of_the_recent_supreme_court_case_and_what_do_experts_think_about_its_outcome.php) · [How is AI legal education reform expected to evolve by 2027, and what does this mean for eDiscovery and document drafting?](https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/how_is_ai_legal_education_reform_expected_to_evolve_by_2027_and_what_does_this_mean_for_ediscovery_and_document_drafting.php) · [What does the AI bar exam analytics 2027 reveal about legal education and practice?](https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/what_does_the_ai_bar_exam_analytics_2027_reveal_about_legal_education_and_practice.php)

Canonical: https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/what_was_the_outcome_of_the_city_nat_bank_v_hunter_case.php
Markdown: https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/what_was_the_outcome_of_the_city_nat_bank_v_hunter_case.php/index.md