# What is the significance of docket number 19-465 in legal proceedings?

legalpdf.io · August 4, 2026

> Docket number 19-465 refers to a landmark Supreme Court case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Also worth reading: What is the...

Docket number 19-465 refers to a landmark Supreme Court case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc.

v.

**Also worth reading:** [What is the significance of Witness 16 in the FBI interview Exhibit D 470 ATT 4?](https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/what_is_the_significance_of_witness_16_in_the_fbi_interview_exhibit_d_470_att_4.php) · [What is the discovery phase of court proceedings and what are the typical costs involved?](https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/what_is_the_discovery_phase_of_court_proceedings_and_what_are_the_typical_costs_involved.php) · [Will AI really replace a large number of jobs in the future?](https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/will_ai_really_replace_a_large_number_of_jobs_in_the_future.php)

City of New York, New York, which was decided on April 27, 2020.

The case involved a challenge to a New York City ordinance that restricted the transportation of firearms outside of the city.

The court's decision was unanimous, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing the opinion.

The dismissal was seen as a disappointment to gun rights advocates, who had hoped for a broader ruling on the scope of the Second Amendment.

Docket number 19-465 was granted a writ of certiorari on January 17, 2020.

The case was argued before the Supreme Court on May 13, 2020, and decided on July 6, 2020.

The Supreme Court ruling in Chiafalo v.

Washington, which was consolidated with docket number 19-465, unanimously upheld the ability of states to enforce an elector's pledge in presidential elections.

Chiafalo v.

Washington stemmed from the 2016 United States presidential election and dealt with the issue of "faithless electors" in the Electoral College.

The Supreme Court's ruling in Chiafalo v.

Washington marked a significant decision on the limits of electoral college voting.

The cases were consolidated for briefing and oral argument, and a total of one hour was allotted for oral argument.

Thepetition for a writ of certiorari in No.

19-465 was granted, and the cases were consolidated and reflected on the docket of No.

19-465.

The Supreme Court's decision in Chiafalo v.

Washington has significant implications for the Electoral College process in future presidential elections.

The case highlights the ongoing debate over the role of electors in the Electoral College and the balance of power between states and the federal government.

The Supreme Court's ruling in Chiafalo v.

Washington was seen as a victory for states' rights and the enforcement of electoral laws.

The case has sparked further debate over the need for electoral reform and the role of the Electoral College in presidential elections.

The Supreme Court's decision in Chiafalo v.

Washington has significant implications for the democratic process and the future of presidential elections.

The case highlights the complexities of the Electoral College system and the ongoing debates over its role in presidential elections.

The Supreme Court's ruling in Chiafalo v.

Washington marks a significant milestone in the ongoing evolution of electoral law and the role of states in the Electoral College.

The case serves as a reminder of the importance of understanding the complexities of the Electoral College system and its role in shaping the outcome of presidential elections.

Canonical: https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/what_is_the_significance_of_docket_number_19-465_in_legal_proceedings.php
Markdown: https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/what_is_the_significance_of_docket_number_19-465_in_legal_proceedings.php/index.md