# "What is the significance of docket number 17-1712 in a legal context?"

legalpdf.io · August 4, 2026

> The case "James J. Thole, et al., Petitioners v. Also worth reading: Will AI really replace a large number of jobs in the future? · What should I do...

The case "James J.

Thole, et al., Petitioners v.

**Also worth reading:** [Will AI really replace a large number of jobs in the future?](https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/will_ai_really_replace_a_large_number_of_jobs_in_the_future.php) · [What should I do if my landlord refuses to provide their PAN card number?](https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/what_should_i_do_if_my_landlord_refuses_to_provide_their_pan_card_number.php) · [What is the difference between family Bates range and child Bates number in programming?](https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/what_is_the_difference_between_family_bates_range_and_child_bates_number_in_programming.php)

U.S.

Bank N.A., et al." with docket number 17-1712 involves a defined-benefit retirement plan, which guarantees a fixed monthly payment to retired participants regardless of the plan's value or investment decisions.

The U.S.

Supreme Court granted certiorari on June 28, 2019, and arguments were heard on January 13, 2020, marking a significant milestone in the case.

Justice Kavanaugh wrote the 5-4 opinion in the case, which was decided on June 1, 2020, highlighting the significance of the Supreme Court's ruling.

The case revolves around two legal issues: when an ERISA plan participant can invoke remedies to police fiduciary misconduct and protect federally guaranteed benefits.

The U.S.

Department of Labor appeared as an amicus curiae in the case, indicating the government's interest in the outcome.

Docket number 17-1712 was submitted to Justice Gorsuch, who granted the application to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari.

The case was preceded by a series of lower court rulings, including the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

The Supreme Court's decision in Thole v.

U.S.

Bank N.A.

has significant implications for the administration of defined-benefit retirement plans.

The National Association of Home Builders of the United States filed a brief of amicus curiae in support of neither party, highlighting the case's broader implications.

The Solicitor General submitted a brief for the United States as amicus curiae, indicating the government's interest in the case.

The Supreme Court's decision in Thole v.

U.S.

Bank N.A.

clarifies the scope of fiduciary duties and remedies available to plan participants.

The case sets a precedent for future disputes involving ERISA plans and fiduciary misconduct, shaping the legal landscape for retirement plan administration.

Canonical: https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/what_is_the_significance_of_docket_number_17-1712_in_a_legal_context.php
Markdown: https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/what_is_the_significance_of_docket_number_17-1712_in_a_legal_context.php/index.md