# "What is the significance of Docket no.

11-393 #OPINION_3-2 in legal proceedings?"

legalpdf.io · August 4, 2026

> The Supreme Court's decision in Docket No. 11-393 established a new standard for determining when government regulations amount to a taking under the...

The Supreme Court's decision in Docket No.

11-393 established a new standard for determining when government regulations amount to a taking under the Fifth Amendment.

**Also worth reading:** [What is the process of discovery for legal proceedings and why is it important?](https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/what_is_the_process_of_discovery_for_legal_proceedings_and_why_is_it_important.php) · [What is the significance of Witness 16 in the FBI interview Exhibit D 470 ATT 4?](https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/what_is_the_significance_of_witness_16_in_the_fbi_interview_exhibit_d_470_att_4.php) · [How is AI legal education reform expected to evolve by 2027, and what does this mean for eDiscovery and document drafting?](https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/how_is_ai_legal_education_reform_expected_to_evolve_by_2027_and_what_does_this_mean_for_ediscovery_and_document_drafting.php)

The case of Dolan v.

City of Tigard is significant in property rights law because it set a standard for determining when government regulations amount to a taking.

The "rough proportionality" test established in the case requires that a regulation must substantially advance legitimate state interests and must substantially advance those interests in a reasonably direct relation to the means used.

The court held that the city's demand that the property owner dedicate a portion of her property for flood control and pedestrian access as a condition of obtaining a building permit constituted a taking under the Fifth Amendment.

The case is important in understanding the concept of regulatory takings and how they affect property owners and businesses.

Regulatory takings occur when government regulations restrict the use of private property in a way that deprives the owner of a valuable right or interest in the property.

The Supreme Court's decision in Docket No.

11-393 is significant because it clarified the test for determining when a regulation amounts to a taking.

The case has implications for property owners and businesses who may be subject to regulations that restrict the use of their property.

The Supreme Court's decision in Docket No.

11-393 is significant in the context of property rights law because it established a new standard for determining when government regulations amount to a taking.

The case highlights the importance of regulatory takings and how they affect property owners and businesses.

The court held that the city's demand that the property owner dedicate a portion of her property for flood control and pedestrian access as a condition of obtaining a building permit was not a legitimate exercise of the city's police power, but rather an unconstitutional taking.

The case is significant in understanding the role of government regulations on private property.

The Supreme Court's decision in Docket No.

11-393 highlights the importance of balancing the rights of property owners with the needs of the community.

The case has implications for the way local governments balance the needs of the community with the rights of property owners.

Canonical: https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/what_is_the_significance_of_docket_no11-393_opinion_3-2_in_legal_proceedings.php
Markdown: https://legalpdf.io/knowledge/what_is_the_significance_of_docket_no11-393_opinion_3-2_in_legal_proceedings.php/index.md